data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d793/4d793699db227294bed7ab7d66467cbdff1b0a52" alt=""
Stickman was born a couple seconds ago in Blender. Pretty leet, yeah? That image is Stickman from an isometric perspective, and from that viewpoint you can see all his sticky awesomeness. However, here is Stickman in the top-down perspective.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe319/fe31943d9b8bd19bd70734862fb8bf48986b1a79" alt=""
Ugh. While Stickman still has awesomeness, so much of it is hidden when viewed from this perspective.
It's when I face the limitations of the top-down perspective that I get frustrated. So often, I spend hours making a character look just right in Blender, only to have it end up appearing to be an indeterminate blob when rendered top-down.
So right now, I'm doing the old, familiar wishy-wash. Do I continue investing time and resources into the top-down perspective, or do I switch the submap view to an isometric perspective? Each format has it's drawbacks. Even 3D has drawbacks. I've tackled the isometric format before, so I understand how much more work it is than the simpler top-down format, and while the results make the extra work worthwhile, I started this project to avoid some of the complexity.
I hate making decisions.
3 comments:
How about a top-down face-on perspective a-la Zelda?
Did someone say "isometric" *grin* ;)
I always seem to come back to isometric at some point, no matter how hard I try to stay away. It's like some kind of drug. Heroin, maybe. Heroin, viewed at an approximately 35 degree angle.
Post a Comment